Difference between revisions of "Improve Identification and Data Collection for NAS"
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
=Available Tools and Resources= | =Available Tools and Resources= | ||
'''World Health Organization''' ''Guidelines for the | '''The World Health Organization''' has published ''Guidelines for the Identification and Management of Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders in Pregnancy.'' It includes methods of data collection and analysis. <ref>http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107130/9789241548731_eng.pdf;jsessionid=55AE69AD37E7</ref> | ||
'''Data-Sharing Considerations for State Public Health Departments and Medicaid Agencies'''-A Technical Assistance Brief<ref>http://www.618resources.chcs.org/wp-content/uploads/618-Data-Sharing-Resource-12.2.20.pdf</ref> | '''Data-Sharing Considerations for State Public Health Departments and Medicaid Agencies'''-A Technical Assistance Brief<ref>http://www.618resources.chcs.org/wp-content/uploads/618-Data-Sharing-Resource-12.2.20.pdf</ref> |
Revision as of 13:17, 25 December 2023
Introductory Paragraph
One of the biggest challenges of addressing neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) is that it is not consistently identified, and collection of data and reporting is inconsistent. A standardized data collection and surveillance in all states and territories would improve the ability to guide public health strategies and interventions.
Key Information
The Association of State and Territorial Health Officials (ASTHO) [1] has published guidance for standards and consideration for health agencies to improve current NAS surveillance. The document titled, Strengthening Health Agencies' Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance through Consensus Data and Standards, includes the following key components for agencies to improve NAS data collection and surveillance: [2]
- Understand the landscape of NAS surveillance capacity.
- Enhance utility of Medicaid protocols
- Build a registry for NAS.
- Achieve consensus
Understand the Landscape. This involves documentation of how state and territory health agencies currently collect NAS data and conduct surveillance. This first step was advanced in the ASTHO report and is foundational to the identification of gaps in standards. Nationally standardized definitions of data and standardized diagnosis codes will improve reporting, collaboration, strategies and interventions for NAS. In 2019, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists (CSTE) proposed a nationally standardized case definition to capture surveillance measures across jurisdictions to inform clinical and public health treatment and prevention efforts. Some of the states surveyed int hte ASTHO reprt are sing these standards while other states are using ICD-9 (779.5) and ICD-10 (P96.1) codes.
Enhance Utility of Medicaid Protocols. This involves expanding Medicaid’s capacity to use NAS data. It also involves improvement of data sharing between public health and Medicaid.
Build a Registry for NAS. This will provide collaboration in data collected and provide standard information across the country. Steps to build a registry include: [3]
- Identify a purpose.
- Determine if a registry is an appropriate means to achieve the purpose.
- Identify key stakeholders and how they have used or interacted with registries for other conditions.
- Assess feasibility.
- Build a registry team.
- Establish a governance and oversight plan.
- Consider the scope and rigor needed.
- Define the core data set, patient outcomes, and target population (data element submission process).
- Develop a study plan or protocol.
- Develop a project plan.
Achieve Consensus. A tool for data element submission will advance the process of informing the development of national standards.
Relevant Research
- This article documents a study in which the predictive value of an algorithm was used to identify cases of NAS using administrative Medicaid claims data. [4]
- This article summarizes a study that was performed using publicly available information regarding NAS surveillance activities and definitions. Since current clinical case definitions use different combinations of clinician-observed signs of withdrawal and evidence of perinatal substance exposure, there is discordance in diagnosis codes used in surveillance definitions. This summary provides an understanding of the different clinical case and surveillance definitions that are used across the United States. [5]
Impactful Federal, State, and Local Policies
Protecting Our Infants Act of 2015 (POIA) addresses problems related to prenatal opioid exposure. It called for HHS to review planning and coordination of HHS activities related to prenatal opioid exposure and NAS and to study and develop recommendations for the prevention, identification, and treatment of NAS as well as the treatment of opioid use disorder in pregnant women. [6]
The 2022 National Drug Control Strategy calls for developing a data plan and a consolidated database. One major source of administrative data within the data strategy includes the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) on records of emergency department admissions and inpatient hospital stays from participating states compiled by the Agency for Healthcare Quality and Research (AHRQ). It provide data on drug overdoses and NAS. [7]
Indiana State Department of Health (ISDH) In response to the high rate of opioid prescriptions, the Indiana General Assembly charged ISDH to: develop a standard clinical definition of NAS and a standardized process of identifying it, identify the resources hospitals need to do this, and then establish a voluntary pilot program with hospitals to implement this standardized NAS identification. In 2016, 26 of 89 Indiana Birthing Hospitals took part in this pilot screening program. ISDH noted that universal screening in a non-punitive environment would allow us to understand the true prevalence of perinatal substance use and NAS. ISDH) established a task force which provided a standard clinical definition of NAS, stating that the infant must be symptomatic, have two or three consecutive modified Finnegan scores equal to or greater than a total of 24, and either a positive toxicology test OR a maternal history with a positive verbal screen or toxicology test. [8]
Available Tools and Resources
The World Health Organization has published Guidelines for the Identification and Management of Substance Use and Substance Use Disorders in Pregnancy. It includes methods of data collection and analysis. [9]
Data-Sharing Considerations for State Public Health Departments and Medicaid Agencies-A Technical Assistance Brief[10]
EMI Advisors Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) Data Element Tool (DET) Dashboarding[11]
Registries for Evaluating Patient Outcomes: A User's Guide. While not specific to NAS, this guide is useful to support the design, implementation, analysis, interpretation, and quality evaluation of registries created to increase understanding of patient outcomes. [12]
Promising Practices
The Florida Perinatal Quality Collaborative- NAS Initiative: Key drivers of change[13] A review of the data collection process.
Missouri Hospital Association Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome: Guidance to Improve Clinical Documentation and Data Capture- Identifies gaps, challenges and solutions for data capture and documentation.[14]
Public Health Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Reporting Registry The Kentucky Public Health Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) Reporting Registry received fewer reports of Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome (NAS) in 2019[15]
Georgia Department of Public Health Division of Health Promotion NAS Annual Surveillance Report – 2017[16]
Sources
- ↑ https://www.astho.org/
- ↑ https://www.astho.org/globalassets/pdf/strengthening-health-agencies-nas-surveillance-through-consensus-driven-data-standards-practices.pdf
- ↑ https://www.astho.org/globalassets/pdf/strengthening-health-agencies-nas-surveillance-through-consensus-driven-data-standards-practices.pdf
- ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6317565/
- ↑ Standardization of State Definitions for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome Surveillance and the Opioid Crisis, retrieved at https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6687235/
- ↑ https://aspe.hhs.gov/reports/status-report-protecting-our-infants-act-implementation-plan-0#:~:text=IMPLEMENTATION%20STATUS%20OVERVIEW%20%20%20%20Recommendation%20Category,%20%20100%25%20%201%20more%20rows%20
- ↑ https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/National-Drug-Control-2022Strategy.pdf
- ↑ https://www.in.gov/children/files/cisc-2015-0218-Infant-NAS-_Final-_Report.pdf
- ↑ http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/107130/9789241548731_eng.pdf;jsessionid=55AE69AD37E7
- ↑ http://www.618resources.chcs.org/wp-content/uploads/618-Data-Sharing-Resource-12.2.20.pdf
- ↑ https://www.emiadvisors.net/nas-det-dashboard
- ↑ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK208616/
- ↑ https://health.usf.edu/-/media/Files/Public-Health/Chiles-Center/FPQC/MORE-Webinar-DataCollection-Dec2019.ashx?la=en&hash=99CA53B2C91E9D8425A4908FE96B7CA02C2D9D2A
- ↑ https://www.mhanet.com/mhaimages/sqi/brief/issue%20brief_triple%20aim_NAS_0918.pdf
- ↑ https://chfs.ky.gov/agencies/dph/dmch/Documents/NASReport.pdf
- ↑ https://dph.georgia.gov/document/publication/nas-2017-annual-report/download